On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 12:31:33PM -0400, Hugo Haas wrote:
> [ I don't know if this discussion is on-topic or not, but anyway, I'm
> replying here. ]
Sure! Anything you guys find interesting is on topic.
This isn't meant to be a place where I alone broadcast a bunch of
junk to you guys, but where we all broadcast junk to each other :)
> On Thu, Jul 27, 2000, Mags wrote:
> > anyone know of a link checker that will find cold fusion errors as well as
> > netscape errors?
>
> What do you mean by Netscape errors?
>
> Anyway, I only know link checkers checking links on HTML pages, i.e. the
> links found in well-known attributes in the HTML code.
>
> I was considering adding a new option to the W3C link checker[1] which
> was to make it extract URIs from a document regardless of the mark-up
> and check them, but I haven't done it yet. That would let you check most
> of the links in your ColdFusion script.
>
> 1.
http://validator.w3.org/checklink
BTW, the other day I added a Letterman quote to impressive.net's
home page [2], and discovered the CITE attribute on BLOCKQUOTE. [3]
That's another one you could add to checklink.
[2]
http://impressive.net/
[3]
http://impressive.net/services/dtrt/dtrt?html:blockquote
--
Gerald Oskoboiny <
[email protected]>
http://impressive.net/people/gerald/