google refining scoring with user input?

Replies:

Parents:

  • None.

Re: google refining scoring with user input?

Replies:

Parents:

* [email protected] <[email protected]> [2001-03-22 13:46+0100]
> From time to time (and since yesterday, always), instead of going directly
> to the target site, google send you to links like that:
[..]

The behavior has not changed for me. It still happens occasionally,
but is not systematic.

On a somewhat related note, I noticed that Google has not updated its
index for more than a month now. I use a search box for larve.net[1]
and noted that recent pages, although fetched by Googlebot a month
ago, were not indexed. I noted the problem for the W3C site too for
more than a month.

They are not indexing URIs containing an '@' character, have done a
bad job IMO about the deja.com takeover, are now not updating their
indexes. Google is still the best search engine, but I am less
enthusiastic about it than before.

All The Web / FAST Search[2] OTOH looks better and better to me.

 1. http://larve.net/#search
 2. http://www.alltheweb.com/
--
Hugo Haas <[email protected]> - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
Everybody gotta wear clothes, and if you don't, you get arrested. --
Mr. T

Re: google refining scoring with user input?

Replies:

Parents:

Hugo Haas wrote:
>
> All The Web / FAST Search[2] OTOH looks better and better to me.
>
>   1. http://larve.net/#search
>   2. http://www.alltheweb.com/

I was using mostly All The Web for a while, but switched to
Google because the results seemed so much better. Has All the
Web changed its indexing techniques?

_ Ian


--
Ian Jacobs ([email protected])   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Tel:                         +1 831 457-2842
Cell:                        +1 917 450-8783

Re: google refining scoring with user input?

Replies:

  • None.

Parents:

* Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> [2001-03-22 10:48-0500]
> > All The Web / FAST Search[2] OTOH looks better and better to me.
[..]
> >   2. http://www.alltheweb.com/
>
> I was using mostly All The Web for a while, but switched to
> Google because the results seemed so much better. Has All the
> Web changed its indexing techniques?

I think that you meant its ranking techniques.

No, AFAIK it hasn't changed. However, the pages indexed are much more
up-to-date than Google's or Raging's.

Even though they do not have Google's cool ranking (BTW, there will be
several discussions about ranking at WWW10 - should be interesting),
the results are relevant enough when you are looking for something
recent.

--
Hugo Haas <[email protected]> - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
What kind of side dishes will we be enjoying this evening with our
frozen waffles?

FAST Search (was Re: google refining scoring with user input?)

Replies:

  • None.

Parents:

* Hugo Haas <[email protected]> [2001-03-22 08:15-0500]
> On a somewhat related note, I noticed that Google has not updated its
> index for more than a month now. I use a search box for larve.net[1]
> and noted that recent pages, although fetched by Googlebot a month
> ago, were not indexed. I noted the problem for the W3C site too for
> more than a month.
>
> They are not indexing URIs containing an '@' character, have done a
> bad job IMO about the deja.com takeover, are now not updating their
> indexes. Google is still the best search engine, but I am less
> enthusiastic about it than before.
>
> All The Web / FAST Search[2] OTOH looks better and better to me.

So I finally got tired of Google and I now use FAST Search as the
search engine for larve.net (see [1]).

I have also made a search box[4] for the fogo archives.

Maybe I will switch completely to FAST Search soon.

 1. http://larve.net/#search
 2. http://www.alltheweb.com/
 4. http://larve.net/2001/03/fogo_search
--
Hugo Haas <[email protected]> - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
I ain't afraid to fly, and I ain't afraid of no monkeys either. -- Mr.
T

HURL: fogo mailing list archives, maintained by Gerald Oskoboiny