Microsoft Development Woes

Replies:

Parents:

  • None.
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

------_=_NextPart_001_01BFE2AB.83932B70
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"


I stumbled across this e-mail dialog I had with a Microsoft developer last
year. It epitomizes my experience with Microsoft when I've hit serious
trouble developing new Microsoft technology that they push. It is worth a
read, enjoy.

What ticked me off is that it was a pretty major bug in some important DB
technology and it is not recorded anywhere (in fact, the problem is created
when you follow the steps to fix another known/published bug). When
Microsoft (Andy Harjanto from Microsoft) confirms it is a bug, I have to
prod him to get details of the resolution and a date for a problem that they
know about. To be fair it involved a product in Beta (although to solve the
problem I was try to solve, Microsoft said to use this technology -- ADSI).
At least the correspondence is timely.

Curtis

-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Johnstone [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 17, 1999 2:05 PM
To: ADSI Feedback
Subject: ADSI 2.5 Beta 1

Arrrg!

I had problems running ADSI 2.0 with the version of ADO that ships with MDAC
2.1. I found a support article (Article ID: Q216709) which details this
problem. The resolution, it says, is to install ADSI 2.5. The only ADSI 2.5
I can find is Beta 1. I have installed it and MDAC 2.1 MANY, MANY times and
I finally have ADSI working but all my ADO queries fail.

I've narrowed it down to the Active Directory provider shipped with ADSI
2.5. I presume ADO is trying to use it when I make an LDAP namespace ADO
query.

I am SURE this is a bug -- I've tested it on three machines. The Active
Directory provider shipped with ADSI 2.5 Beta 1 does not work for LDAP
namespace querys with the ADO that ships with MDAC 2.1 (msado15.dll).
Specifically on the ADO query I get an unreferenced memory error and upon
debugging there is an unhandled exception in msado15.dll.

What's the deal??



-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Harjanto [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 2:09 PM
To: 'Curtis Johnstone'
Subject: RE: ADSI 2.5 Beta 1


Thanks. It has been fixed few months ago.



-----Original Message-----
From: Curtis Johnstone [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 11:31 AM
To: Andy Harjanto
Subject: RE: ADSI 2.5 Beta 1


Great, so where is it fixed?  What's the resolution to my problem?

Re: Microsoft Development Woes

Replies:

Parents:

On Fri, Jun 30, 2000 at 11:54:46AM -0400, Curtis Johnstone wrote:
>
> I stumbled across this e-mail dialog I had with a Microsoft developer last
> year. It epitomizes my experience with Microsoft when I've hit serious
> trouble developing new Microsoft technology that they push. It is worth a
> read, enjoy.
:
> the answer, but VB still blows chunks when I do an ADS Provider ADO call (it
> GPF's on the execute method).

LOL! Fun stuff...

I hate to be predictable and do the open source cheerleader thing,
but there have been a bunch of times in the past few years where
we came up against a problem with Linux or Apache or something
(usually due to us doing strange things with them), emailed the
developers and got advice or a code patch back within 15-20
minutes. I'll have to research and write up the details sometime.

It really is amazing to be able to get immediate, quality support
from the core developers of large software projects like that.

It doesn't always work out that way, sometimes you have to wait a
few days or poke around in newsgroup archives on your own, but you
always know you can eventually solve whatever problem you have.

--
Gerald Oskoboiny <[email protected]>
http://impressive.net/people/gerald/

Re: Microsoft Development Woes

Replies:

  • None.

Parents:

On Fri, Jun 30, 2000, Gerald Oskoboiny wrote:
> It really is amazing to be able to get immediate, quality support
> from the core developers of large software projects like that.

That's true. On the other hand, having a support contract for something
sure helps some times.

I remember having a problems with multiple interfaces on a Solaris box,
and I bugged the technical until they solved the problem since 3Com had
a contract with them, and they couldn't just ignore me. :-)

But having said that, I don't use any non-DFSG[1] free software anymore,
except mpg123 and Netscape to browse a few pages a day, because I enjoy
being able to use quality software on my computer without having to pay
and being able to screw around with the source.

 1. http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines

--
Hugo Haas <[email protected]> - http://larve.net/people/hugo/
Asleep at the switch? I wasn't asleep, I was drunk! -- Homer J. Simpson

HURL: fogo mailing list archives, maintained by Gerald Oskoboiny