Re: Bayesian Spam Filtering and Bogofilter

On Tuesday 11 February 2003 09:05, Dan Brickley wrote:
> Not cheating at all! This isn't a competition between SA and bogofilter;

Well, it is when I'm testing them. <smile/>

> if they bogofilter algorithms can be used to take into account features
> that SA detects, so much the better.

Ok, so the folks that are using bogofilter in this mode, do you find that
bogofilter is then able to correct SA's false negatives and positives, or
is it just parrotting what you would've learned from SA in the first place?
(I expect the SA+bayesian to add value, but didn't with bogofilter...)